Doorgaan naar hoofdcontent

JEE AOP - how to define 'pointcuts'

Traditional AOP has aspects, i.e. the classes doing the work, and pointcuts: the places where an aspect squeezes itself into.

JEE has some AOP as well, but this is only annotation-bound. So I can define an aspect TimeStuff and an annotation @Timed then all methods or classes need to have an the @Timed annotation added to trigger TimeStuff.

This is a bit sad, because it means having to modify code which we might not control, nor want to modify since it's nice and clean. With Spring (or full) AOP, we can define a pointcut which cuts to all the methods/classes which we want (either in configuration, or in the aspect itself with an annotation), and the original code is none the wiser. Lovely! Nothing to see here, nothing to forget here.

I want that in JEE. It's not quite so simple, but it's doable.
See:
https://github.com/softwaremill/softwaremill-common/blob/master/softwaremill-debug/src/main/java/com/softwaremill/common/debug/timing/TimingExtension.java

Roughly said: in JEE you can create an Extension which extends the startup of the container, and it can then modify the classes... in this case, adding the @Timed annotation to those classes which we want. It just means that our code for the pointcut needs to be programmed out a bit more, but at least we can!

Well, not so fast. It works, but that doesn't make it easy.
I'll show that in a different post. Possibly fully integrated with maven, and liberty-run...

Labels

Labels:

Reacties

Een reactie posten

Populaire posts van deze blog

Spring's conditional annotation with properties

Spring has a nice @Conditional annotation, to have the option to have beans be available in the context depending a specific condition (Of course, this can also be realized by using @Configuration objects, but that's a different post). Ideally, we'd have the option to have a condition evaluate to true or false depending on a property. Sadly, Spring does not support that out of the box. Googling and looking around gives a partial solution, but the complete one here, so we won't forget: /** * Components annotated with ConditionalOnProperty will be registered in the spring context depending on the value of a * property defined in the propertiesBeanName properties Bean. */ @Target({ ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.METHOD }) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Conditional(OnPropertyCondition.class) public @interface ConditionalOnProperty { /** * The name of the property. If not found, it will evaluate to false. */ String value(); /** * if the p...
Een reactie posten
Meer lezen

OSGI insights without sonar

So I was on a project without sonar. Oh my. Well, it was an OSGI project, so the problems couldn't be that bad, right? But how good were they (and what things were bad?) I found Stan4j , a code analysis tool for eclipse, which draws nice graphs and can handle osgi pretty well it seems. Now I can see that dependencies/bundle names aren't properly aligned (even though OSGI doesn't complain), etc.
Een reactie posten
Meer lezen

JPA and transactions

So I was working with JPA and transactions. Consider the following: In bean 1, with implicit TX 1, managed entities are loaded/created,and returned in bean 2, with implicit TX 2, entities are modified in bean 3, with NO TX, bean 1 is called, and the results are passed to bean 2. and bean 4 is similar to bean 3, but with it's own transaction, TX3 What happens when bean 3 finishes: are the entities updated? What happens when bean 4 finishes, are the entities updated? The answer to this is simple; entities are managed through a persistance context. That context is tied to the transaction. So in bean 2, there is a difference. When called from bean 3, it runs in a different transaction then bean 1, and thus a different persistance context, and thus the entities are not managed 'by this transaction'.When called from bean 4, it all runs in the same transaction, TX3, and the results are persisted.
Een reactie posten
Meer lezen