Doorgaan naar hoofdcontent

Thread binding data

In an application we work with threads, but for ease of usage, we may not want to pass around the same objects all the time. It helps in our method signature, signifying the objects we perfrom our function on, but sometimes, it feels rather unnecessary.

For example, let's assume we have a request-id which we recieve, and want to pass to all outgoing requests. Or we want to prevent a certain query being performed multiple times by caching the result.

These are request-scoped data items. Since every request runs in it's own thread, we can use threadlocals.

In spring, we can do a bit better, by using a ThreadLocalTargetSource
https://dzone.com/articles/an-alternative-approach-to-threadlocal-using-sprin-1

This allows us to get a thread-instance per request, which can be injected into our services without any knowledge of caching occuring.

In essence, we create some sort of thread-tied global object. This is, of course, something which can be easily abused, and can lead to hard to follow code. But, it can also clean up a bit of nasty code, so we should use it if we must.

Reacties

Populaire posts van deze blog

Spring's conditional annotation with properties

Spring has a nice @Conditional annotation, to have the option to have beans be available in the context depending a specific condition (Of course, this can also be realized by using @Configuration objects, but that's a different post). Ideally, we'd have the option to have a condition evaluate to true or false depending on a property. Sadly, Spring does not support that out of the box. Googling and looking around gives a partial solution, but the complete one here, so we won't forget: /** * Components annotated with ConditionalOnProperty will be registered in the spring context depending on the value of a * property defined in the propertiesBeanName properties Bean. */ @Target({ ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.METHOD }) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Conditional(OnPropertyCondition.class) public @interface ConditionalOnProperty { /** * The name of the property. If not found, it will evaluate to false. */ String value(); /** * if the p...

OSGI insights without sonar

So I was on a project without sonar. Oh my. Well, it was an OSGI project, so the problems couldn't be that bad, right? But how good were they (and what things were bad?) I found Stan4j , a code analysis tool for eclipse, which draws nice graphs and can handle osgi pretty well it seems. Now I can see that dependencies/bundle names aren't properly aligned (even though OSGI doesn't complain), etc.

JPA and transactions

So I was working with JPA and transactions. Consider the following: In bean 1, with implicit TX 1, managed entities are loaded/created,and returned in bean 2, with implicit TX 2, entities are modified in bean 3, with NO TX, bean 1 is called, and the results are passed to bean 2. and bean 4 is similar to bean 3, but with it's own transaction, TX3 What happens when bean 3 finishes: are the entities updated? What happens when bean 4 finishes, are the entities updated? The answer to this is simple; entities are managed through a persistance context. That context is tied to the transaction. So in bean 2, there is a difference. When called from bean 3, it runs in a different transaction then bean 1, and thus a different persistance context, and thus the entities are not managed 'by this transaction'.When called from bean 4, it all runs in the same transaction, TX3, and the results are persisted.